
- Price
- $25/75k
- Cash
- 50% upfront
- Cycle
- 10 days
Commercial offer
A rail corridor capacity study should not be a slow PDF. It should force one decision: proceed, pause, kill, or gather the exact records needed to price the corridor.

What this does
Observed facts, source documents, stakeholders, constraints, and open diligence are separated from inference.
ROW, NEPA, STB, Buy America, BABA, safety responsibility, and owner-standard questions are surfaced early.
The output is a next-action memo. Proceed, pause, kill, or gather specific evidence before engineering spend.
Sources and evidence
Federal grants create a repeatable funding path for eligible rail projects.
Claim claim_fra_grants_surface · Confidence high · Caveat: Eligibility depends on program, applicant, benefit-cost evidence, and NEPA posture.
Federal Railroad Administration: FRA GrantsCompliance caveat
Map applicability before scope claims
Required owner: track owner / responsible railroad
Identify responsible party and exclusions
Required owner: roadway worker employer / railroad
Do not opine on capacity without qualified review
Required owner: track owner / bridge engineer
Flag crossing authority path
Required owner: railroad / road authority
Exclude or route to signal specialist
Required owner: responsible railroad / signal maintainer
Create item-level compliance ledger
Required owner: sponsor / procurement lead
Classify authority path; do not bury as scalar risk
Required owner: sponsor / lead agency
Require legal screen before buildability claims
Required owner: sponsor / rail counsel
Use as hard gate before scoring
Required owner: owner / sponsor
Add contract archetype and exclusions
Required owner: sponsor / contracting lead
Start here
Tell us the corridor, owner, scorecard result, constraint, deadline, and procurement path. The first reply is a fit screen, record request, and recommendation on whether the 10-day brief is the right step.
Capability packet, W-9, COI, NDA, and scope letter available on request.